Effects of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Plyometric Training on Endurance Running Performance
top of page

Effects of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Plyometric Training on Endurance Running Performance

The IUSCA Journal is the world's first in S&C and Sport Science to be 100% Free to submit, publish and read. We have a new article now in Community Review by Ian Greenwood, Anthony Kay, and Anthony Baross from Milton Keynes College and the University of Northampton. Please help take part in the review process by clicking the link below to the Journal and then access the pdf.


Effects of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Plyometric Training on Endurance Running Performance


by Ian J. Greenwood @IanGreenwood17, Anthony D. Kay, and Anthony W. Baross @TonyBaross



Abstract


The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of an 11-week unilateral versus bilateral plyometric training intervention on maximal isometric voluntary (MVC) knee extensor torque, countermovement jump height (CMJ), running economy (RE) and 3-km time trial (TT) performance.


Twenty-seven recreationally trained endurance runners (12 females and 15 males) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: unilateral plyometric training (UPT; n = 9), bilateral plyometric training (BPT; n = 9) and control (CON; n = 9). RE, VO2max, 3-km treadmill TT, isometric MVC (bilateral and unilateral) and CMJ (bilateral and unilateral) were measured prior to and after 11 weeks of training (UPT and BPT; volume equated, 20-40 minutes, 2-3 days/week). Separate two-way repeated measures ANOVAs were used to assess within and between group differences in RE, VO2max, 3-km TT, maximal isometric knee extensor torque and CMJ.


Following 11 weeks of plyometric training there were significant improvements in RE (UPT 5.6%; BPT 4.9%, p < 0.01) and 3-km TT performance (UPT 2.4%; BPT 2.5%, p < 0.01) in addition to CMJ (UPT 12.5%; BPT 14.5%, p < 0.01) and maximal isometric knee extensor torque in the unilateral group (14.0%, p < 0.01). No significant differences in VO2max or anthropometric measures were detected (p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences between training interventions (p > 0.05) were detected in any measure.


These data demonstrate that UPT and BPT result in similar improvements in RE and 3-km TT run performance in recreational distance runners.


Click the link below to read the full article and take part in the review process:

0 comments
bottom of page