INTRODUCTION
In the profession of strength and conditioning (S&C), there is a need for a standardised, comprehensive framework that can allow for the alignment of international certifications, qualifications, and standards. This need stems from the lack of clarity surrounding the awarding levels of different governing bodies and organisations worldwide, as well as the increased connectedness of international sport and physical activity. Central to such a framework is understanding the current issues affecting S&C coaches, current professional standards and guidelines, and remuneration structures. As the sole dedicated international accreditation body, the International Universities Strength and Conditioning Association (IUSCA) carried out market research analysis and stakeholder engagement with regional and international educational authorities (Ofqual, European Commission, UNESCO, USDE, CHEA, TEQSA, ASQA) to develop a global framework for the rating and awarding of S&C courses, certifications, and qualifications.

This has resulted in the proposed development of the International Qualification Framework (IQF), presented in this paper, which aims to provide transparency and understanding of the global qualification structure, and the equivalent levels of education and standards across different awarding organisations. A universally recognised framework will accommodate the diverse range of S&C qualifications within the profession, thus facilitating global mobility and international recognition of S&C professionals. standardization to accrediting bodies. As an introductory document, its primary goal is to establish a common understanding and foundation, which can lead to further collaboration with stakeholders in the development of essential resources.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL QUALIFICATION FRAMEWORK
Step 1: The first step to creating the IQF was to determine a universal rating system that could be applied to the current and future S&C sector. This approach required detailed examination of qualification rating systems to determine appropriate qualification level range to be rated separately, while allowing for general comprehension and practical application. It was agreed that the standardised rating system of the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) and Regulated Qualifications Framework (RQF), which have set formal educational standards, rated from 1-8, would achieve this objective. A pilot of the EQF has been carried out with the Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) and the New Zealand Qualifications Framework (NZQF). In this framework, Level 1 corresponds to foundational learning, equivalent to early school education. Level 2 is generally equivalent to the educational attainment in high school. These levels then progress through various 'further' and 'higher' educational levels (FE and HE), with a bachelor's degree being classified Level 6, and a master's degree classified Level 7, culminating in Level 8, which represents doctorate level. In between these levels, all education, both formal and informal, academic, and vocational, can all be rated appropriately (Table 1).

Step 2: Once the ratings system was determined, step two involved identifying professional bodies and organisations that deliver S&C education programs and award qualifications and credentials. This process allowed quantification of recognition levels. The following organisations were identified: (1) National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA), (2) Australian Strength and Conditioning Association (ASCA), (3) UK Strength and Conditioning Association (UKSCA), (4) Chartered Institute for the Management of Sport and Physical Activity (CIMSPA), and the (5) International Universities Strength and Conditioning Association (IUSCA). It was recognised that organizations like the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM), British Association of Sport and Exercise Science (BASES), and National Academy of Sports Medicine (NASM), also offer certifications in S&C-related fields, such as personal trainer, physical and strength coach, tactical S&C, and performance and sport scientist. However, these certifications are beyond the scope of this paper, although may form the basis for future uses of the IQF.

 

Step 3: The qualification levels of each organisation were then assessed in consultation with two independent consultants in the field of educational frameworks (RQF/EQF and US Pathways). The corresponding IQF levels were then determined by quantifying the learning outcomes and assessment criteria for each awarding organisation, mapping these standards to the relevant levels from 1-8. Table 2 outlines the IQF level and corresponding international certifications.

Step 4: The last stage in developing the qualification framework was to synthesize the competencies and responsibilities at each IQF level and connect these components to the specific requirements of the S&C profession. An S&C job search was performed from September 2021 to September 2023 via online employment marketplaces. Job listings were reviewed for common job types and key attributes. Table 3 summarises IQF level and job role alignment to the core competencies and responsibilities.

PROFESSIONAL RELEVANCE
The IQF addresses several critical aspects of the growing and evolving S&C profession. Firstly, it provides consistency, transparency and clarity in S&C education and certifications across the global landscape. Secondly, it ensures a clear, objective pathway for continued career development, from entry-level through to advanced positions. Finally, the IQF enhances professional recognition and opens the possibility of portability of certifications internationally. This is an important consideration, allowing employers to compare candidates' expertise on a global scale, rather than limit to restrictions of one awarding organization. Collectively, the IQF potentially opens the job market and enhances the internationalization opportunities for candidates and employers.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS
While this paper serves as an introduction to the IQF, highlighting the potential to positively impact the profession, it is important to recognise ongoing development and refinement. This will require a collaborative effort and robust dialogue between stakeholders. Such a collaborative approach promotes industry engagement, with input from the global S&C community to shape the IQF and ensure that it is effective in representing the international collective. Therefore, the IUSCA has identified four potential development areas, these include: 

1. Regional integration, particularly into the Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and South America.

2. Detailed job descriptions aligned to IQF level.

3. Minimum salaries aligned to IQF level.

4. Detailed qualification mapping and international recognition between accrediting bodies.
 

CONCLUSION

The development of the IQF marks a seminal milestone in the professionalisation the S&C sector. By, consistent global structure for qualifications, the IQF not only supports the career development of S&C professionals, but also upholds the integrity and excellence of the profession, offering tangible benefits for practitioners, educators, and employers.